Is Cellular Phone radiation related to sleep problems, Corneal Damage, Behavioral Changes, sperm count, fatigue, irritability, hypertension, allergies, tinnitus, Autism, CFS , Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Alzheimer's?

By Andrew Michrowski

Note from the BioElectric Shield Company to the reader: for years we have been on Dr. Michrowski's mailing list, and have received numerous excellent articles from him via email. We have attempted to find the original publication of this information, but have not been successful. We believe he would want you to have this important information, so we are keeping it on our website for your information. To access more of his work, simply put his name in a search engine. He does not have a website, but many of his talks and papers are available online.

The level of typical exposure to cell phone-related emissions has more than doubled in the last 5 years.

Shield Reduced my stress...

I can't thank you enough for your product.

-Barbara Happy 

Click here to read our Cell Phone Safety Guide


Whole Life Expo 2005 Toronto, November 27, 2005


New problems with cellphones

Andrew Michrowski, Ph.D.

The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc

100 Bronson Avenue, Suite 1001 OTTAWA, Ontario K1R 6G8 (613) 236-6265; fax: 235-5876

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


The level of typical exposure to cellphone-related emissions has more than doubled for most Canadians in the last 5

years. This exposure has interacted with vaccines, common drugs and may be responsible for the genetic variations of

Asian flu and E Coli distribution. Although sensitivity and absorption of these emissions is not the same for all, children

are more vulnerable than adults. What can soon happen on a large scale in Canada has already occurred in Japan

where MDs specialize in pathologies related from cellphone emission exposure, with limited success.


In our growing dependence on wireless telecommunication systems, we increasingly find ourselves absorbing electric

and magnetic wave emissions from these microwave systems. Although the human species has evolved amidst a

broad band of these same frequencies that originate from throughout the universe, in the last few decades, human

exposure to artificial, repetitive signals has risen dramatically – by more than a trillion times. We can even compare the

average United States exposure to radiofrequency and microwave fields in 1980 (0.005 microWatt/cm2) with that of

1999 (1.0 μWatt/cm2) we note a 200-fold increase, according to the United States Environmental Protection

Agency. We can only expect further quantum leaps in exposure as the plans of investors, the military and other

government agencies materialize: to have every dwelling, school, office and store in the world become a microwave

transmitter for wireless computers and related linkages, and to have transceivers implanted within our bodies as

guardian “digital angels”.

What we are being currently exposed to?

In Southern Central Canada, the typical exposure to background microwave emissions from radio-microwave

technology (0.5 Megahertz- 2GigaHz bandwidth) has also increased considerably the last few years. We have

conducted several surveys along the principal highway corridors – in good and dry weather conditions, when field

levels are at their lowest amplification mode - from Windsor, Ontario through Drummondville, Quebec, with northerly

incursions from Toronto, through Peterborough, Ottawa, and Pembroke and north of the metropolitan Montreal area.

The results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Background emissions (0.5 MHz – 2GHz band) along highways, selected Canadian cities, 2005

City μWatt/cm2 City μWatt/cm2 City μWatt/cm2

Windsor central 0.2 - 1.5 Toronto 2.5 – 100 Montreal 0.1 – 2.5

Windsor South 0.2 – 2.5 Toronto East 1 – 2.5 Montreal East 0.1 – 2.5

Chatham 0.2 Toronto North 1 – 5 Longueuil 0.1 – 1.5

Rodney 0.1 Pickering 1 – 5 St-Hubert 0.1 – 1.5

Southwold 0.25 Ajax 1 – 5 St-Hyacinthe 0.1 – 1.5

London 0.2 – 2 Whitby 1 - 5 Drummondville 0.1 – 1.5

London suburb 0.05 Oshawa 1 – 5 Laval 0.1 – 1.5

Ingersoll 0.05 Bowmanville 0.2 - 2 St-Jovite 0.1 – 1.5

Woodstock 0.25 Port Hope 0.25 St-Sauveur 0.1 - 0.25

Paris 0.1 Trenton 0.2 - 5 Ste-Adèle 0.1 - 0.25

Brantford 0.8 – 9 Belleville 0.2 – 2.5 Mirabel 0.25 – 8

Ancaster 0.25 Kingston 0.25 Lachute 0.05

Hamilton suburb 1.0 – 4 Brockville 0.25 Masson 0.1

Hamilton central 2.0 – 5 Prescott 0.25 Gatineau 0.1 – 0.25

Burlington 1.0 – 4.5 Cornwall 0.25 Arnprior 0.1 – 0.25

Oakville 1.0 – 4.5 Ottawa 0.1 - 5 Renfrew 0.1 – 0.25

Oakville industrial 2.5 – 8 Vaudreuil 0.1 – 0.5 Perth 0.1 – 0.25

Mississauga 4.0 – 25 Montreal West 0.1 – 0.5 Peterborough 0.25 - 1

The above minimum microwave power levels – mostly from cellphone technology - can be amplified by a number of

factors by soil moisture, metallic structures, combination with other emitters, for example: radiofrequency emergency

communication towers, trucks, telephony towers, and geographical features. Typical amplification after heavy rainfall is

about 6-fold, electric composite waves with other transmitters, in wet weather allows for 10-fold power amplification.

Thus, Toronto’s background microwave power levels in some neighborhoods can rise to between 25 and 1,000

μWatt/cm2, well into Canada’s regulatory Safety Code 6 maximum permitted level, which is based on often-permanent

heating effects for the whole body, such as increase in body temperature, often several degrees Celsius in directly

exposed areas.

We are now approaching a situation where more and more often, even without using microwave technology appliances

such as microwave ovens, cellphones, wireless computers, citizens in many areas will be exposed to levels higher

than the legal exposure limit determined by the Government of Canada. In the meantime, millions of Canadians

(there are over 15,000,000 Canadians owning cellphones) are exposed to power levels that exceed Safety Code 6

while using government-sanctioned appliances.

Table 2. Typical microwave power emissions, various technologies

(Canada Safety Code 6 limit – about 600 - 1,000 μWatt/cm2 – frequency dependent;

City of Toronto Board of Health guideline limit 10 μWatt/cm2

Government of Italy, quality target: 0.1μWatt/cm2)

Appliance, device (dry weather conditions) μWatt/cm2

Cellphone @ user 9 – 3,500

Cellphone, second hand exposure 1 - 200

Microwave oven @ user 10 – 2,000

Cordless phone base station @ 2 to 6m 7 - 17

Analog in urban environment (1-2 blocks away) 5 – 25

Digital in urban environment (within 100m) 0.2 - 5

Analog in rural environment 500m 0.25 - 30

Local amplification by metal window, door frames, studs,

metal plumbing, grounding wire, unfiltered telephone and

Cable TV wires

1 to 4.5 fold

power increase

We can observe that there are many situations whereby microwave technology users and passersby can be exposed

to levels that are critical. Note that the number of emitters can, in real life conditions, multiply these figures. In rooms,

where you sit next to a window facing a transmitter can make a difference, since a window frame might be focusing

signals, which are contemporaneously reradiated by a bulky metal radiator, or even a mirror. The zone where this

combinatory effect exists may be very small, less than 2 square meters, however. Towers should never be at the same

height as nearby residences.

Existing radio-frequency/microwave environments should be analyzed and considered to avoid microwave power

amplification by radiofrequency fields with electric “composite waves”, which are consistently vertically polarized.

Composite waves are perceived by living bodies as enhanced microwaves. This is important in antenna farms and

along highways where there is elevated use of radiofrequency/microwave technologies.

When using cellphone, localized re-radiation effects can be caused by such things as pimples on the face,

eyeglasses, the structural frame of a car body, etc.

Inside large buildings that have wireless technology antennae, a safer place is usually in the shadow of the base

station and worse at a short distance from the transmitter(s), especially if you actually see transmitter specifically

directed towards your area.

There has been reported an alarming increase in autism in young persons associated with vaccines that appears to be

associated with the mercury content therein used for stabilization. It is known that mercury amplified

radiofrequency/microwave power absorption in tissue. This may be another example of new cellphone problem

affecting a special market. 64% of Canadians between ages 15 and 29 own a cellphone and 40% of Canadians

between ages 12 and 24 consider cellphones to be their main means of communication. Children are more consciously

sensitive to microwaves than adults, according to a 1999 United Kingdom government scientific advisory.

What we can expect as health effects due to these new exposures?

Table 3. Experimental observations with low-level microwave exposure

Observation Effects of microwave emissions Exposure level

Effects on DNA Single and double-strand breaks, electron flows within staked base pairs of double helix of

DNA molecules, direct gene transcription, 40-90% increase in Fos mRNA from cellphone


2h, 0.6W/kg,




Toxins may reach brain tissues: serotonin, glucose, selective

permeability, allows glucose to pass

After 2 minutes, as

low as 0.0004W/kg



Neurotransmitter functions modified: Pentobarbital (alters narcosis), entylenetetrazol

(more convulsions), Curare (less anaesthesia), Valium, Librium (potentiated).

Endogenous opiods activated: increase in alcohol use, less of withdrawal symptoms in




eye damage

Worsen effects.



Major errors in judgment, vision altered; disruptive attitude (hyperactivity); memory

problems, [non-lethal weapons for combat advantage]; synthase inhibition caused by

increase in body nitric oxide production by digital (pulsed) signals



Faster reaction time, auditory memory retrieval [mind control], difficulty in concentration,

“fuzzy thinking”, dizziness (indication of serotonin activity increase)

0.16 μWatt/cm2

Sleep May promote sleep, sleepiness, reduction of REM sleep (important to memory, learning)

Melatonin Melatonin secretion decreases




ELF-encodes in wireless transmissions may imitate heartbeat, cellular communications,

brainwaves, cell growth, human metabolism; sperm count lowered, irreversible infertility in

mice after 5 generations from “an antenna park”, chicken embryo mortality increases by


As low as 0.005



Observed in Korean War, US embassy personnel in Moscow, cumulative effects



Fatigue, irritability, nausea, anorexia, depression

Cardiovascular disorders, hypo/hypertension

Change in skin, skin allergies, eczema, psoriasis

Increase in lymphocytes, effects in EEGs, reduced insulin production, multiple allergies,

Tinnitus, itches in the ear, ears feel heated

As low as 0.02 to

8.0 μWatt/cm2

Some, natural, highly-coherent oscillations in living beings have same or similar characteristics as those produced by

wireless technologies. For example, the 2Hz-encoded signal from cellphones reporting to base stations resembles the

heartbeat (and can entrain heartbeat). Other extremely-low-frequency-encoded signals resemble, and interact with,

brain waves, cell growth, cell communication, calcium ion balance and other fundamental life processes, even at levels

as low as 0.005W/kg.

Cellular antenna effects in neighborhoods, including cancer

Health problems associated with antennae are also occurring in less affluent nations. In Slupsk, Poland at least 60

persons 25 to 30 meters from a radio-TV and cellular antenna farm died over a period of 4 years, apparently from

transmission exposure. In Usfie, Israel, a cancer cluster was noted along a strip on Mount Carmel, adjacent to nearly

40 cellphone masts and 15 pirate radio transmitters. At issue are at least 89 deaths - mostly cancers, some strokes -

and individuals with health problems such as depression. Suicides are also reported in the area. Student achievement

levels dropped to the lowest in Israel; wild birds have deserted the area, and frequent birth defects were observed in

pets. On March 14, 2000, the antennae were burned down by enraged citizens, after authorities denied antennainflicted

injuries. Later, camouflaged antennae were installed and health problems recurred. Other Israeli communities

have since learnt how to prevent cellular mast installations by demanding commitment from cellular companies to fund

lawsuits filed for compensation as a result of installation. The method was applied by local authorities in Petah Tikva,

whose demand to write a warranty (that transfers the responsibility to any lawsuit) from Cellcom company, eventually

led the company's withdrawal from its intention to erect antennas in the city. The Israeli National Planning and

Construction Council decided to enable warranty requirement from companies to protect local committees in case

lawsuits that prove damages. Lawyer Ron Zin, who represented Petah Tikva notes, "It turns out to be that the demand

itself for a warranty, prevented erecting the antenna".

Situation in Japan – as a precursor to ours

The worldwide proliferation of Alzheimer's is diagnosed reluctantly in Japan, due to a national stigma attached to the

condition. While Japanese TV has health-topic programs on brain aging, noting that younger people show deterioration

of mental faculties similar to the elderly and that chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and depression are rampant, these

are ascribed to psychological factors. The shows point out missing nutrients or indicate mental exercises to keep

"thinking young". The condition occurs in over 2 million Japanese, affecting all ages. Among the young, it manifests as

social withdrawal, and they shut themselves off in rooms. At first, the media named it "jiheisho" (autism), then

"hikikomori" or withdrawing and hiding. The sudden onset coincides with a major expansion of cell phone service.

Teruhisa Miikethat of Kumamoto University Medical School notes that 75% of "withdrawn children" have CFS with

reduced blood flow to the brain, accompanied by disorders in central nervous system function and immune function. "If

you force them to go to school, they risk having real psychological problems as a result”, he says. Ryoichi Ogawa,

Kobe MD, reports that 80% of his CFS patients are frequent users on a daily basis of cellular phones, personal

computers, TV games, etc.. He decided on a clinical study to test a cause-effect relationship of cellular phones and

computers to CFS. Ogawa chose 40 from his young CFS patients (to compare them with 50 healthy persons) to

measure their blood flow in the upper eyelid ophthalmic artery that branches off from the carotid artery carrying blood

from heart to brain), with the super Doppler method - a test that verifies blockage of brain blood vessels. Subjects held

a cellphone, at their left ear for 30 seconds. Prior to use, all showed normal blood flow of 10 cm/sec. in the arteries of

both eyes; after phone use, the flow dropped to less than 5 cm/sec. for all those tested - a rate indicating reduced brain

blood flow. Exposure from sitting within 1 meter of a video screen for 15 minutes also reduced brain blood flow to less

than 5 cm/sec. in both eyes for all CFS patients; among the healthy, 78% had a reduction to less than 5 cm/sec. in

both eyes. Healthy participants resumed normal flow within 30 min.; only 2/3rd of CFS ones recovered normally.

Perhaps, we are due to expect similar health patterns in such areas as the Toronto region, Brantford and perhaps

Hamilton and Ottawa within the coming years. Clusters may be expected where analog telephones are widely used, in

high traffic zones and near building complexes surrounding large shopping malls, hospitals, police, airports and

educational facilities.

Effects on genetically-modified organisms

An unstable and misidentified genetically-modified corn Bt176 has been implicated in the deaths of at least a dozen

German dairy cows. Various varieties of approved but unstable genetically-modified corn varieties have led to a trail of

fatalities and cross-contamination and probably would have never been approved worldwide had more been known

earlier about genetic engineering, and it may be too late to limit the damage still in progress. French and Belgian

government scientists have recently reported "rearrangements, truncations and unexpected insertions", the main

inserts occurring in suspected "megatransposon" that exchanges segments between chromosomes, rendering

unstable some varieties. Thus, some genetically modified varieties produce about 7X more toxin protein than others!

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has reported 2 dangerous and 2 minor toxin proteins are actually processed

or degraded in the popular Bt11 variety GM corn! These mutation-toxins are unreported to the public.

Is it possible that the translation modification of proteins (in this case, new toxins) take place in the fields, due in part to

exposure environmental microwave emissions in the farms?

In fact, we know much too little about genetics at this time to be able to protect ourselves from such mutations.

Statistician Ulrich Mansmann at University of Heidelberg points out that a series of papers published in journals like

Nature, NEJM, and The Lancet base their impressive results on ad hoc methods - so it is impossible to assess their

quality. He refers to microarray studies as "a methodological wasteland", with evidence unacceptable in other medical

tests, an opinion shared by PloS Medicine senior editor Virginia Barbour who also advises Microarray Gene

Expression Data Society.

Aspects of cellular activity modulation and regulation require analysis of the proteome (complete profile of proteins).

Microarrays of antibodies to proteins have already been considered. Studies show poor correlation between mRNA

and protein, due to additional processes such as post-transcriptional control of protein translation, post-translational

modification of proteins, and protein degradation. The current estimate is that there are more than 200 types of protein

modification. 5 to 10% of mammalian genes code for proteins that modify other proteins. Consequently, the human

proteome is expected to range from 100,000 to several million different protein molecules - in striking contrast to the

small number of genes. Furthermore, no function is known for more than 75% of predicted proteins of multicellular

organisms, and the dynamic range of protein expression can be as large as 107. "Knowledge of genomic sequences

and transcriptional profiles do not allow a reliable description of actual protein expression, let alone an examination of

protein-protein interaction or prediction of the protein's biochemical activities," state Wlad Kusnezow and Jörg

Hoheisel of Functional Genome Analysis in Heidelberg, Germany.

Margaret Cam at DNA Microarray Core at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

wanted to use microarrays to study gene expression in pancreas cells. Her research team used same RNA samples on

DNA microarrays from 3 suppliers and got highly inconsistent results. Out of 185 genes common to all 3 arrays, the

expression pattern of only 4 genes agreed with one another - a noise level as high as 98%. Marc Salit, physical

chemist at National Institute of Standards and Technology said Cam's findings causes "one's jaw to drop". Other

former enthusiasts consider gene arrays oversold, especially for diagnostics. Richard Klausner, formerly at National

Cancer Institute, now at Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, admits to having been "naïve" to think that new

hypotheses about disease would emerge from huge files of gene-expression data. The more data he gathered on

kidney tumour cells, the less significant they became.

Microwave effects on avian flu, E.Coli, etc.

Influenza has a tendency to mutate into new serotypes and it is suggested that novel radiofrequency/microwave

emissions (waveform, frequency, radiation mode, intensity) enable mutation into strains that do not meet adequate

immunity responses. The 1918-19 pandemic of Spanish flu – which killed more persons than World War I, started on

the world’s first radio ship, as the surviving seaman collapsed at Bordeaux harbor from an avian flu virus that was

genetically modified with on-board wireless equipment into a variation to which humanity had not acquired an immunity

to. A more recent serotype in Hong Kong (2003) may have been the result of a combination of the introduction of a

novel wireless technology, geography, moisture (and aerosol activity) and sanitary conditions; likewise, for the most

recent cases of mutated avian flu in Beijing some weeks ago. Vietnam (2004) and Indonesia, with their own

technological introduction of wireless technology and special fauna might have become new conditions for mutation,

when historically they have not been in the past. Once in a while there are reports in luxury liners of unexplained mass

health problems, clearly not associated with food poisoning, which may have been spawned as mutations with the

introduction a high-tech wireless systems on board in conjunction with coastal security technologies.

It would be worthwhile to elaborate on the two recent Fraser Valley, British Columbia avian flu poultry issues as it

covers several specializations: DNA effects from RF/mw exposure, radiation patterns (including re-radiation inside

structures and from surrounding mountain chains), effects of weather (soil moisture) on intensity of signals, including

those of other antennae sources through a beating process, etc. I believe that collectively we can develop a good case

study and that we might even find funding to support it to a high level of detail and quality.

The deadly Walkerton, Ontario Escherichia.Coli strain was a rare, more deadly form only found in remote jungle of El

Salvador. How did it get to Walkerton, and infect the community’s water supply? The summer that spawned it was

unusually wet, to the point that cattle manure overflowed in fields with their prominent E.Coli constituent of digestive

flora being exposed to very powerful analog cellphone tower emissions, in tandem with other radiofrequency fields

source to able to achieve a critical mass situation leading a locally-mutated E.Coli strain.

Anomalous situations

In the advent of wireless technology, we are witnessing more and more bizarre microwave phenomena in homes. A

whole suburb in Ottawa near the airport’s landing path has difficulty in establishing cellular phone connection. Cellular

service companies have given up and are recommending other frequency phones devices. If you try to play a video

cassette player, a talk-radio station broadcasting from about 20 km away will overwhelm the sound track! In Montreal,

families can listen to wireless telephone conversations through the interference patterns between microwave ovens

and cellular phone antennae located on top of a local school. Some individuals acquire microwave hearing and may

find it easier – in certain zones – to follow aircraft-control tower communications and the like.

Hospitals have all kinds of security systems (most operating in radiofrequency ranges), polluting lighting fixtures by the

beds, monitors, automated beds, medical devices each of which can produce “hot spots”, usually near to patients (and

which have the potential of even genetically modify hosts of microbes). Hospitals also acquiesce to the leasing of their

roofs and perimeter walls for cellular phone antennae as a means for increasing revenues.

What can be done?

In many built environments, microwave power levels are too elevated for even minimum health risk conditions.

Many health practitioners are unaware either of the general exposure conditions, not those of their patients, thus not

taking under consideration their bearing of the diagnosis, nor therapy at hand. Similarly, employers may not realize that

the microwave environment faced by their employees might adversely affect their job performance, occupational health

and safety and productivity.

Fortunately, appropriate design and careful oversight in installation can provide citizens with acceptable, safe and

generally no-risk levels of electromagnetic fields.

But the implementation of these measures, even if they entail relatively no cost to the public or private purses, requires

a public demand for common sense safety.

Municipal governments who participate in the siting process by issuing permits are in the frontline for complaints and

legal filings because they are, legally, accomplices. The City of Toronto has an active guideline that provides for a

Canadian platform for precedence from a health and safety legal perspective, that other communities can emulate, and

eventually help industry and federal regulatory agencies, including the Canadian Radio-Television and

Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), review their current policies and practices.

An European Parliament expert analysis in 2000, which was comprised of World Health Organization, European

Community and scientific peers recommended that the average annual exposure near microwave emitters should not

exceed 0.10 μWatt/cm2 (following the lead of the Italian Government notion of quality target) and that anyone

exposed to higher fields should receive regular medical attention, including blood analysis, EEG and ECG tests. All

zones with higher exposure rates should be posted with markings on pavement and with road signs.

You can always view your wireless transmission environment on the Industry Canada website at

Note from BioElectric Shield - If you've read anything we've written, I'm sure you're expecting this...above all, wear your personal BioElectric Shield which will protect you everywhere you go. If you live in a densely populated area and/or have a lot of technology of your own, or neighbors who do so, we recommend also having Room Shields in your most used rooms - the media room and of course, your bedroom.

Why are we recommending multi-level protection? Your levels of radiation exposure are increasing almost daily...more cell towers, Smart Meters, smart cars, cars with BlueTooth technology, electric and hybrid cars, WiFi and WiMax everywhere and who knows what else is going to be added to the mix in the upcoming months and years. This multi-level protection isn't about us selling more products, it's about our mission to help you live a safer, healthier, happier life. When you compare these protective options with the alternatives, they are a bargain especially when you factor in the long lives of the Shields - we still have customers wearing the Shield they purchased in 1990.

We talk to people daily who have gone from healthy to EMF sensitive and even extremely ill in a short time after having just one more EMF source added to the mix. One of the big issues with getting to this point is that once your body has reached that tipping point, you tend to become more sensitive not only to EMF, but to other toxins and frequencies around you and getting back to a healthy state takes much longer than if you prevent the problem in the first place. Read more about "The Body Burden" and how it can be harming you.

OrderNowRoundFreeDeliveryRoundimage shield 90dayback

Pin It
energy protection

Energy Protection

  1. Protect your body
  2. Shield your electronics
  3. Reduce EMF in your home

Get Protection Now



  • Increased focus
  • Renewed Energy
  • Less Stressed and Happier

Product Reviews