Marketing or Propaganda – What’s the truth about 5G?


The Crowd is Smiling

I, AnnaMariah, was at a talk recently and the speaker was Oregon Congressman, Greg Walden, who is chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.  In this role, he worked to pass legislation to grow American jobs by expanding access to wireless broadband – i.e. 5g networks. He was a dynamic speaker who sincerely seems to believe that rolling out 5g networks nationwide is a positive thing.

With great feeling, he discussed the sad case of tens of thousands of people in rural areas without access to cell reception or the internet. I could feel those around me agreeing that everyone needs and deserves access to high-speed internet and that anything else is unimaginable.

What about 5G Should you Know?

Since I’ve read research about the dangers of 5G and had the opportunity to talk to people in the last year who’ve been physically debilitated by these same networks, I was shaking my head. But as I looked around me at a room of about 300 people, I saw only smiles and nodding heads. I felt like I was in a room where I was the only person who hadn’t drunk the Kool-Aid.

I realized at that moment why so few people seem to be concerned about the double issues facing us of Smart Meters and 5G networks. The impact of these devices can affect your heart, DNA, blood flow and all the systems of your body. The truth is, we are guinea pigs and the full impact of all this may not be completely realized for decades.

Many people feel that our government won’t allow or promote anything that hasn’t been proven to be safe. The opposite is true – until it is absolutely, irrevocably proven to be dangerous they will continue to back it.

Listen to what the Take Back your Power Network has to say about 5G.

“Earlier this year, The Guardian published an article citing research which showed that while 67% of independently funded studies found a biological effect of exposure to Radio Frequency radiation, only 28% of industry-funded studies did. Industry-funded studies are almost two and a half times less likely than independent studies to find health effects.15 The authors of the Guardian article explain that the telecoms industry doesn’t need to win the scientific argument about safety, but simply keep the argument running indefinitely by producing studies with results that fail to verify, or even better contradict, the research that does find adverse health effects.  “

The question posed in our newsletter title was “Marketing or Propaganda”

The battle for our minds is as old as human history. Those who seek to control or advance their own agendas use propaganda to sway public opinion. The use of suggestion to stimulate our reactions is widely used by making broad and positive statements, not even recognizing that there may be another side to the issue. By using simple, direct language we become convinced that the speaker is truthful and has our best interests at heart.

As I saw yesterday, appeal to our desires, faster internet, better cell phone coverage, etc, bypasses our critical minds that might ask at what cost.

What’s the downside?

I am not going to go into great detail about all the research and discussions from well-known scientists who have been researching EMF and Wi-Fi effects for decades – I’ll let people like Take Back Your Power share their info with you. I will, however, ask you to consider the possible consequences of increasing the number of satellites orbiting earth from the current 2,000 or so to around 20,000 – each one of them irradiating our beautiful planet.

I love my cell phone and the internet; it’s an indispensable part of my life. But do I really need it to be ten times faster, and a hundred times more powerful? Do we want our natural environment and all the people and creatures upon it to be subjected to ever-increasing radiation? The waves that connect our smartphones to the internet go through stone, brick, cement and wood….what happens when they go through our bodies? Science is showing that it’s affecting our DNA, our mitochondria, our brains, our organs and all the systems in our bodies.

Because the new 5G network has a much shorter wavelength, it requires cell towers or “base stations” to be spaced every 100 meters or 328 feet. The towers are small but will operate at much higher power than what we currently have. Every living creature will be subjected to powerful doses of extremely high-frequency radiant electricity.

What could this mean for you personally?

“As well as its ability to concentrate power in focused beams phased array technology has a further complicating factor. Either side of the main beam, the time intervals between the pulses are different from the time intervals between those of the main beam, but they may overlap each other in such a way as to produce extremely rapid changes in the electromagnetic field. This can have a particularly detrimental effect on living organisms, because instead of the radiation decaying when it is absorbed into living tissue, it can be re-radiated within the body.

The moving charges streaming into the body effectively become antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the organism. These re-radiated waves are known as Brillouin precursors, named after the French physicist Leon Brillouin, who first described them in 1914. Research suggests that they can have a significant and highly detrimental impact on living cells.” 1

How Can You Protect Yourself from 5G Side Effects?

5g is marching across the country and into our lives, homes and bodies. It’s up to you to take steps to protect yourself and your family. We always suggest that you shield your entire body from radiation. The go-to product for this is the BioElectric Shield. You can also use Room Shields to add protection to any room in your house. It’s fine to put EMF protection on your devices – your phones and tablets – but 5G will be EVERYWHERE in the environment, so full body protection is really the only safe way to deal with it.

Review from a customer The BioElectric Shield Saved me

“I found out last year that the pain and strange symptoms I’d had for several years was from home wi-fi and electrical issues. Heard about the shield from a functional medicine Dr. who had seen results with other patients and purchased a Level 3 Shield after doing the photo analysis, fully expecting to return it after the 90 days were up. After a few days of wearing a shield I began to feel better and after several weeks, felt incredibly better especially in restaurants, coffee shops, etc (removed my wi-fi router at home). At 90 days, I returned the shield sensing that my body had healed itself and within 2 weeks of sending it back the pain came back. I was unable to go anywhere there were cell towers, phones or wi-fi. Once I realized the shield had been helping me so much I called and reordered another shield and wear it every day without fail. Even considering the purchase of a custom shield.”

Review posted February 27, 2018 by Kay on the level 3 Shield page


1Quote from 5G; The Big Picture  by Take Back Your Power

Leave a Reply