Experts advise caution despite inconclusive link between cell phones and cancer
Posted: September 14th, 2009 06:49 PM ET
WASHINGTON (CNN) - The science is still out, but evidence so far indicates people should limit how much we use a cell phone, BlackBerry or iPhone due to a possible cancer risk, a Senate subcommittee heard Monday.
For video report http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/14/cell-phone-cancer-link-inconclusive-but-experts-advise-caution/?fbid=Vgaz9i0LJLZ#comments
While no solid connection between mobile communications devices and human cancer has been established, studies indicating the likelihood of such a link call for a precautionary approach, medical experts testified at the hearing chaired by Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa.
Recommendations included using such devices less, keeping them away from the body, and limiting their use by children.
"Children have a configuration of their skull that does allow penetration of cell-phone radiation," noted Dr. John Bucher, associate director of the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health.
However, Bucher stopped short of declaring a causal link between cell-phone use and human cancer.
Other witnesses before the Senate Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee noted the relatively short history of widespread cell-phone use, dating back only two decades.
Early studies are inconclusive, said Dr. Siegal Sadetzki of Tel Aviv University, but those done on subjects after 10 years of cell-phone use were showing higher incidences of tumors and other problems.
She cited a correlation between the amount of use, the side of the head where the device was held for talking, and incidences of tumors in salivary glands in that area.
"Until definite answers are available, some public health measures - especially for children - should be instituted," Sadetzki said. "It's not whether we should use cell phones, but how we should use them."
None of the participants in the hearing - including Harkin - said they were giving up their cell phones, but all agreed that restricting use and keeping the units away from the body were good ideas.
Dr. Devra Davis - a founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute - criticized U.S. regulators and researchers for a lack of attention to the issue. She called for updated standards based on new research, and increased funding for more extensive research.
"I am not alarmed - I am concerned, because the world has changed very rapidly and we have a right to know," Davis said
Note from BioElectric Shield: In October 2008 the EPA changed the level of lead particles in the air said to be safe - they reduced the previous allowance by 90%. What does that tell you about how far things can go and how much damage can be done before the scientists all agree?
Do you want to wait until you’re a statistic? Much like smoking, EMF radiation has cumulative effects. Protect yourself and your family now with a BioElectric Shield. Our new all brass room Shield is a very affordable solution. In addition to reducing affects of EMF, the Shield will also balance your energy field and deflect other people’s negativity and stress. Wearers report more energy, less stress, better overall health.
- Affiliate/Distributor Registration
- +BioElectric Shields
- +Shield Accessories
- Package Deals
- +EMF Home & Device Protection
- +Mind and Body Health
- Gift Certificates
“I seem to have weathered a 10-hour time change with a minimum of jet lag in both directions. While I am getting a lot less sleep per night, my energy has not flagged. My thinking is clear, and calm, not irritable. During the last 2 months I have been closely exposed to many people who have had colds and flu. In spite of being extremely busy, in spite of having taken a grueling trip to Israel and back, and in spite of having to endure a difficult and stressful home life, I have not had one day of illness since wearing the Shield. I am flabbergasted!”
- S. Bayne, Attorney/Mother, CA, USA