Testing the BioElectric Shield

Research has found that when a person is wearing a the EMF Protection BioElectric Shield, their body strength, heart rate, and acupuncture meridians remains in the healthy, strong range despite exposure to electro-magnetic radiation and stressful situations. We also discuss the use of Gauss Meters when evaluating an EMF Protection device. Last, there are a series of 3 short videos in which Dr. David Getoff reviews several emf protection pendants and compares them to the BioElectric Shield.

Research on the EMF Protection BioElectric Shield

Since 1990 to the present, a wide range of studies has proven the Shield's strengthening effects on the human energy system. Research documents greater resistance to any stress-producing stimuli, including computer and cell phones, stressful people or situations. Enhanced peak performance and health are shown by increased strength and healthy acupuncture scores. All research was performed with our basic shield, the sterling silver with brass tabs design.

Testing the BioElectric Shield research by Susan Blackmore. Because Ms. Blackmore's research article is prominently featured in Google searches, we feel you need to hear the whole story of this research. We address this study at the end of the legitimate studies that were conducted.. (Read more on -Testing the BioElectric Shield -Susan Blackmore study).

1. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Human Energy Systems as Measured by Computerized Acupuncture-Pilot Study (October, 1992 Original Study with Data

Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 6 six subjects in a pilot study. Fifty (50) different acupuncture points were measured using the Interro, a Computerized Acupuncture diagnostic device. Three measurements were taken:

1. Baseline acupuncture scores were established.
2. Subjects wore the Shield for three weeks.
3. The same points were retested.

Discussion: Acupuncture point measurement is one measurement of a person's health. In this study, the acupuncture readings showed greater strength and balance in the energy flow through the acupuncture points, indicating better health. Specifically, improvements were seen in the functioning of the immune system, kidney, liver, gall bladder, allergy points, , and stomach points, in summary, all the body organs and systems.

Dr. Brown retired from practice in 2000. Listed below are credentials and memberships active at the time research studies were conducted: Diplomate of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; Diplomate of the American Board of Chiropractic Neurologists. Certified in Applied Kinesiology; Impairment Evaluator in Montana. Membership: Montana Chiropractic Association; Yellowstone Chiropractic Association; American Chiropractic Association; American Chiropractic Association Council on Neurology; Member of the International College of Applied Kinesiologists. Original Study with Data

2. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield verses Placebo Shields in Double-Blind Studies
(December 1993) Original Study with Data

Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 25 patients under 3 conditions:

1. Using applied kinesiology, they found a muscle that would test weak on a particular subject.
The subjects were tested holding shield A (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.
2. The subjects were tested holding shield B (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.

The examining doctor was not aware of which Shield they were testing. The authentic Shield strengthened all 25 patients and the placebo shield strengthened no one.

3. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness Attributed to EMF Exposure
(January 1994) (Original Study with Data)

There are many sources of electromagnetic radiation (ELF): battery-operated devices, cell phone, TV remote, blow dryers, computers. These three devices all radiate 60-hertz frequency waves. Twenty-five (25) patients were tested under 3 conditions:

1. Baseline strength established using applied kinesiology
2. An emf generating device (battery operated clock) held in the heart area and strength was measure
3. The Shield was held while the subject still held the clock at the heart area. Strength was measured.

Results: In the two groups, 24 out of 25 people showed a drop in muscle strength. All 24 regained their original level of muscle strength after placing a Shield on their chest for only one minute.

4. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield verses Placebo Shield in Double-blind study
(1994) (Replication of Study 2 done by Dr. Charles W. Brown) (Original Study with Data)

In a replication of the above study, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko, DC, DABCN, tested 25 patients under the same conditions. The authentic Shield strengthened all 25 patients and the placebo shield strengthened no one. Dr. YuRichko is a Board Certified Chiropractic Neurologist, Diplomate: American Academy of Pain Management.

5.Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness Attributed to EMF Exposure
(June 1994) (Original Study with Data)

In a replication of the above study, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko tested 25 patients under the same conditions.

Results: In the two groups, 25 out of 25 people showed a drop in muscle strength. All 25 regained their original level of muscle strength after placing a Shield on their chest for only one minute.

6. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Human Audio Resonance Patterns
(September 1994) (Original Report)

A pioneer in sound healing, Sharry Edwards, PhD., offered to test 3 of her patients without a shield, and then after wearing a shield for only 5 minutes.

All three of their voice patterns went into "perfect resonance" after only 5 minutes. In this line of healing, perfect resonance is an indication of health in the body. Dr. Edwards stated this was "unheard of, and most impressive, demonstrating the balancing and strengthening effect the Shield has on the human body".

7.Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response- Pilot Study
(September, 1996)(Original Study with Data with Data)

Pilot study conducted by Charles W. Brown, D.C., D.A.B.C.N. to record human EMG response when exposed to the electromagnetic field generated by a computer. Results suggest a general weakening of muscle strength during exposure. The Bioelectric Shield mediated the stress generated by enhancing muscle strength bringing it back to, or higher than baseline, pre-exposure EMG strength levels.

8. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response
(September, 1996) (Research Document)(Summary with Data)(American Journal of Electromedicine Discussion of Research)

Dr. Brown tested 25 subjects using a device called the Compufet, which produces a computerized reading of muscle activity and strength. It is accurate to .2 of a pound, and used in
hospitals and clinics worldwide.

Three measurements were taken:
1. To establish a baseline, strength was measured.
2. After sitting in front of a computer for 5 minutes, strength was measured.
3. After 5 minutes of wearing a Shield, still sitting in front of the computer, muscle strength was measured.

After the subject had sat in front of the computer for 5 minutes, the average drop in muscle strength averaged 16.89 %. In condition 3, after wearing a shield for 5 minutes, strength was restored in all 25 subjects, showing a 25.75% increase over the weak score.

In all 25 subjects strength was restored by wearing the Shield, suggesting the Shield cancels the weakening effects of emf. In 19 of the 25 subjects, strength was greater than the baseline reading, suggesting a more generalized strengthening effect on the biofield.

9. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Strength Using a Dynamometer Parameter
(October 1999)(Original Study with Data)

Virginia Brown, an Occupational Therapist, was testing the claim from many customers that they felt physically stronger when wearing the Shield. Two measurements were taken to test this hypothesis. Initial baseline readings were taken. The subject then wore a Shield over their lower sternal region for one minute. The relative strength or weakness of the opponens muscles was then re-evaluated with the dynamometer. Of the 50 individuals tested, 96% showed average increased muscle strength of 24%. Objective metrics demonstrate the BioElectric Shield increases muscle strength in most (96%) individuals.

10. Effects of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Stress Tolerance Patterns
(October 1999)(Original Study with data)

Fifty (50) individuals were tested by an Occupational Therapist using a dynamometer, a device used in clinics to test finger or grip strength. Each subject’s opponens muscle was tested with a dynamometer to determine relative strength or weakness during 3 conditions.

1. Baseline strength while they were visualizing a blue sky.
2. While visualizing a stressful situation in their lives.
3. After the subject then wore a Shield over their lower sternal region for one minute and then visualized the same situation.

When visualizing a stressful situation, 47 out of 50 subjects showed a decrease in muscle strength. When holding a Shield, all 47 subjects regained their strength even while visualizing the same stressful situation. This study suggests the BioElectric Shield strengthens the human biofield during stress.

11. Effect of EMF Protection BioElectric Shield on Cardiac Response to Mobile Phone
(June 2002) (Alternative Medicine Article with Research Data)

Michael Borkin, N.D. of Santa Monica, Californian uses HRV (Heart Rate Variable) to assess the condition of his patients. In this informal study, heart rate was found to increase when subjects used a cell phone. Heart rate was stabilized when the subject put on a BioElectric Shield.

Dr. Borkin: "HRV is the measurement, in milliseconds, of the beat-to-beat changes in a subject’s heart rate, and it gives a glimpse of the state of the autonomic nervous system. This system controls the beating of the heart, the movement of the gastrointestinal tract, and the secretion of hormones. The HRV test is a good measurement of a body’s overall response to stimuli. We had the subject answer her cell phone, this time while wearing the BioElectric Shield. Her HRV monitor showed that her autonomic nervous system remained stable, with no change in her heart rhythms."

12. Monroe Harmonic Translation System Report- Energy Evaluation of EMF Protection with Bioelectric Shield and Teslar emf protection watch
(1994) (Full Report with Data)

Without knowledge of the company, a holistic practitioner performed an analysis of the performance of both the BioElectric Shield and the Teslar watch on a patient who showed an abnormally high reading of 132 (anything over 100 is considered a problem) on his  electromagnetic pollution reading. The device is similar to the older Voll Dermatron system, and is considered more accurate. It will measure many types of toxicity, including electromagnetic toxicity. When the clinician placed the BioElectric Shield on the client, the EM pollution scores dropped to 75, well within the healthy range.

13. Testing the BioElectric Shield by Susan Blackmore, PhD, MSc and Nicholas Rose, BSc (At the time this research was conducted, Susan J. Blackmore was a reader and Nicholas Rose was a research assistant in the department of psychology, University of the West of England, St Matthias College, Bristol, England. Dr. Blackmore is now a freelance writer and broadcaster.)

For those of you who have heard of Lynn McTaggart's quantum physics intention research, this will make a great deal of sense to you. Here's what happened. We asked our Shield makers to create 12 Shields, 6 that were placebo (sham) and 6 that were real. We sent them to Ms. Blackmore (a visiting lecturer at the University of West of England) to give to one of her PhD. candidates, Nicholas Rose, who was required to complete a study, and then submit it for publication, as a requirement for graduation. He wrote back to say that the study was inconclusive because they all worked to a certain degree. Thus, no statistical significance could be given to the real Shields.

We asked him to mail them back to us. Our consultants, who see energy fields around everything (to its cellular level) told us that even the placebo (sham) Shields had "shield energy" coming out of them. Dr. Brown and I were incredulous. How could this happen? She explained that the intention of the Shield makers didn't change even when they were making the placebos. Thus their intention (unconsciously) of the Shield energy went into those "Shields", giving them some power.

In Lynn McTaggart's research on quantum physics, she has not only accounted for the physics of intention, but she has conducted 9 intention experiments, using participants over the Internet, to intend a result. The first one asked 16 meditators who were based in London to direct thoughts to a laboratory in Germany run by Dr.Fritz Popp, a renowned theoretical physicist. They were asked to attempt to lower measurable biodynamic processes in 2 types of algae, a plant and a human volunteer. Significant changes were seen when the meditators were sending the intentional thoughts verses times when they were resting.*

Likewise, in the Susan Blackmore-Nicholas Rose study, intention was responsible for producing positive responses in all the subjects, not just the ones using real Shields. We were told by our consultant that the effects of the placebo would wear off in a matter of months, but the experiment was done only days after they were made, thus producing these results.

The abstract of their study is as follows:
"A pendant was claimed to provide numerous health benefits, including reduced stress, increased strength, and protection from electromagnetic radiation from computers and mobile phones. Three experiments tested the effectiveness of this pendant’s effect as a bioelectric shield. In the first experiment, 12 subjects who work with computers wore shields (6 real, 6 sham) for several weeks and were regularly tested for hand strength and mood changes In the first experiment, 12 subjects who work with computers wore shields (6 real, 6 sham) for several weeks and were regularly tested for hand strength and mood changes. Both types of shield increased calmness, but the real shields did not have any greater effect. In 2 further studies ( in each N = 40 ) hand strength was measured at baseline, with mobile phone, and with mobile phone and bioelectric or sham shield. The shields did not differ in their effects. Both studies showed a significant correlation between the change in strength with and without the shield and subjects’ scores on a questionnaire concerning their belief in and use of alternative therapies. The shields appear to produce a measurable placebo effect but are otherwise ineffective."

The conclusion reconsidered within the context of Quantum Physics (intentionality) The conclusion they reached, that "the shields provide a placebo effect but are otherwise ineffective" makes sense if one is using ONLY statistical analysis to reach a conclusion. The reality is that all of the subjects DID notice positive effects, but because ALL of them did, the conclusion, only from a statistical model, is that the effects must ONLY be placebo. When examining this from the physics of intention, we see that BOTH the real and the intentionally empowered Shields produced effects. This is another example of the power of thoughts, as proven by biophysicists such as Dr. Popp. This just goes to show you that numbers are only numbers, and only mean anything of value if they are seen in the proper context!

The Use of Gauss Meters when evaluating EMF Protection Devices

The issues with using Gauss Meters to evaluate the effectiveness of an EMF Protection Device. Based on an interview with an electrical engineer.

If you don't see a movie screen here, you can view 4 minute explanation of how to measure the effectiveness of an emf protection device: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UWRibp2jYE

Doctor Evaluates EMF Protection Devices

Dr. David Getoff reports patient experiences wearing the BioElectric Shield as compared to other EMF devices he has tested over the past 10 years.

Dr. Getoff tests all his energy sensitive patients with the BioElectric Shield and many other energy protection devices. In 16 years of testing he has tested thousands of people. In this testing 90% tested strong with at least one product, and 98% of the time it's the BioElectric Shield. Proving over and over again that the Shield works far better than many other products on the market. Find out more about his experiences and testing.

Part I

Part II

Part III