We are currently updating our web site. There may be missing images or misaligned text while we complete this process. If you wish to order, and have any problems please call 866-567-8909 or 541-535-2214 to place your order. Thank-you for your patience!

Research has found that when a person is wearing a BioElectric Shield, their body strength, heart rate, and acupuncture meridians remains in the healthy, strong range despite exposure to electro-magnetic radiation and stressful situations. 

Research on the BioElectric Shield

Since 1990 to the present, a wide range of studies has proven the Shield's strenthening effects on the human energy system. Research documents greater resistance to any stress-producing stimuli, including computer and cell phones, stressful people or situaions. Enhanced peak performance and healht are shown by increased stregnth and healthy acupuncture scores. All research was performed with our basic shield, the sterling silver with brass tabs design.

Protection from electromagnetic radiation

1. Effect of BioElectric Shield on Cardiac Response to Mobile Phone (June 2002)

   Michael Borkin, N.D. of Santa Monica, Californian uses HRV (Heart Rate Variable)to assess the condition of his patients. In this informal study, heart rate was found to increase when subjects used a cell phone. Heart rate was stabilized when the subject put on a BioElectric Shield.(Full article) Dr. Borkin: "HRV is the measurement, in milliseconds, of the beat-to-beat changes in a subject’s heart rate, and it gives a glimpse of the state of the autonomic nervous system. This system controls the beating of the heart, the movement of the gastrointestinal tract, and the secretion of hormones. The HRV test is a good measurement of a body’s overall response to stimuli. We had the subject answer her cell phone, this time while wearing the BioElectric Shield. Her HRV monitor showed that her autonomic nervous system remained stable, with no change in her heart rhythms."

2. Computerized Electromyography (EMG)

   Test subjects sitting in front of a computer for five minutes experienced a 16.89% reduction in muscle strength. After wearing the Shield for only 5 minutes, strength was restored in all 25 subjects. In 19 of the 25 subjects, the wearer's strength was BEYOND their initial reading.

3. Applied kineseology (AK) - original and replicated study

   Two studies showed 49 out of 50 subjects weaken when exposed to the emf from a battery-operated clock. Strength was restored in all 49 when they put on a shield.

4. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Human Energy Systems as Measured by Computerized Acupuncture-Pilot Study

   (October, 1992)Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 6 six subjects in a pilot study. Fifty (50) different acupuncture points were measured using the Interro, a Computerized Acupuncture diagnostic device. Three measurements were taken:
   1. Baseline acupuncture scores were established.
   2. Subjects wore the Shield for three weeks.
   3. The same points were retested.

Discussion: Acupuncture point measurement is one measurement of a person's health. In this study, the acupuncture readings showed greater strength and balance in the energy flow through the acupuncture points, indicating better health. Specifically, improvements were seen in the functioning of the immune system, kidney, liver, gall bladder, allergy points, stomach, and allergy points, in summary, all the body organs and systems.

Dr. Brown is a Diplomate of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners and a Diplomate of the American Board of Chiropractic Neurologists. He also is certified in Applied Kinesiology and as an Impairment Evaluator in Montana. Membership includes the Montana Chiropractic Association, the Yellowstone Chiropractic Association, the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) and the A.C.A.'s Council on Neurology. He is also a member of the International College of Applied Kinesiologists.

5. Double-Blind Study -Effects of BioElectric Shield verses Placebo Shields in (December 1993)

   Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 25 patients under 3 conditions.

   1. Using applied kinesiology, they found a muscle that would test weak on a particular subject.
   2. The subjects were tested holding shield A (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.
   3. The subjects were tested holding shield B (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.
   
   The examining doctor was not aware of which Shield they were testing. The authentic Shield strengthened all 25 patients and the placebo shield strengthened no one.

6. Double-Blind Study- Effects of BioElectric Shield verses Placebo Shields (Replication of Study #2) (June 1994)

   In a replication of the above study, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko tested 25 patients under the same conditions. The authentic Shield strengthened all 25 patients and the placebo shield strengthened no one.
   
   Dr. YuRichko is a Board Certified Chiropractic Neurologist, Diplomate: American Academy of Pain Management.

7. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness Attributed to EMF Exposure (Replication of Study#3) (June 1994)

   In a replication of the above study, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko tested 25 patients under the same conditions.
   
   Results: In the two groups, 25 out of 25 people showed a drop in muscle strength. All 25 regained their original level of muscle strength after placing a Shield on their chest for only one minute.

8. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness Attributed to EMF Exposure (January 1994)

   There are many sources of electromagnetic radiation (ELF): battery-operated devices, cell phone, TV remote, blow dryers, computers. These three devices all radiate 60-hertz frequency waves. Twenty-five (25) patients were tested under 3 conditions.

   1. Baseline strength established using applied kinesiology.
   2. An emf generating device (battery operated clock) held in the heart area and strength was measured.
   3. The Shield was held while the subject still held the clock at the heart area. Strength was measured.
   Results: In the two groups, 24 out of 25 people showed a drop in muscle strength. All 24 regained their original level of muscle strength after placing a Shield on their chest for only one minute.

    

9. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Human Audio Resonance Patterns (September 1994)

   A pioneer in sound healing, Sharry Edwards, PhD., offered to test 3 of her patients without a shield, and then after wearing a shield for only 5 minutes.
   
   All three of their voice patterns went into "perfect resonance" after only 5 minutes. In this line of healing, perfect resonance is an indication of health in the body. Dr. Edwards stated this was "unheard of, and most impressive, demonstrating the balancing and strengthening effect the Shield has on the human body".

10. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response- Pilot Study (September, 1996)

    Pilot study conducted by Charles W. Brown, D.C., D.A.B.C.N. to record human EMG response when exposed to the electromagnetic field generated by a computer. Results suggest a general weakening of muscle strength during exposure. The Bioelectric Shield mediated the stress generated by enhancing muscle strength bringing it back to, or higher than baseline, pre-exposure EMG strength levels.

11. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response (September, 1996)

    Dr. Brown tested 25 subjects using a device called the Compufet, which produces a computerized reading of muscle activity and strength. It is accurate to .2 of a pound, and used in hospitals and clinics worldwide.
    
    
    Three measurements were taken:

    1. To establish a baseline, strength was measured.
    2. After sitting in front of a computer for 5 minutes, strength was measured.
    3. After 5 minutes of wearing a Shield, still sitting in front of the computer, muscle strength was measured.
    
    After the subject had sat in front of the computer for 5 minutes, the average drop in muscle strength averaged 16.89 %. In condition 3, after wearing a shield for 5 minutes, strength was restored in all 25 subjects, showing a 25.75% increase over the weak score.
    
    In all 25 subjects strength was restored by wearing the Shield, suggesting the Shield cancels the weakening effects of emf. In 19 of the 25 subjects, strength was greater than the baseline reading, suggesting a more generalized strengthening effect on the biofield.

12. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Strength Using a Dynamometer Parameter (October 1999)

    Virginia Brown, an Occupational Therapist, was testing the claim from many customers that they felt physically stronger when wearing the Shield. Two measurements were taken to test this hypothesis. Initial baseline readings were taken. The subject then wore a Shield over their lower sternal region for one minute. The relative strength or weakness of the opponens muscles was then re-evaluated with the dynamometer. Of the 50 individuals tested, 96% showed average increased muscle strength of 24%. Objective metrics demonstrate the BioElectric Shield increases muscle strength in most (96%) individuals.

13. Effects of BioElectric Shield on Stress Tolerance Patterns (October 1999)

    Fifty (50) individuals were tested by an Occupational Therapist using a dynamometer, a device used in clinics to test finger or grip strength. Each subject's opponens muscle was tested with a dynamometer to determine relative strength or weakness during 3 conditions.

    1. Baseline strength while they were visualizing a blue sky.
    2. While visualizing a stressful situation in their lives.
    3. After the subject then wore a Shield over their lower sternal region for one minute and then visualized the same situation.
    When visualizing a stressful situation, 47 out of 50 subjects showed a decrease in muscle strength. When holding a Shield, all 47 subjects regained their strength even while visualizing the same stressful situation. This study suggests the BioElectric Shield strengthens the human biofield during stress.

14. Susan Blackmore Research- A Note Clarifying this Invalid Study

    There was a study that appeared in the Alternative Therapies, September, 2002 testing the effectiveness of the BioElectric Shield. Through human error, placebos and real shields were marked incorrectly, invalidating the study. The error was not detected until the study had been published. Below is listed the legitimate research studies.